Happy to take my blinders off if you provide the evidence.
I have provided proof of the US holding other sovereign countries (Iraq and Afghanistan) using its army. The Iraqis wanted the US military to leave. It refuses to do so. If you call day night, there is nothing I can do to disabuse your views. The US occupations in the last 20 years has no parallels in what the Chinese are doing. Please provide evidence of countries China is holding using its military and then I will be glad to take my so-called blinders off.
Apart from this and the Irani civilian deaths, the U.S. supported Saudi Arabia militarily to kill innocent civilians in Yemen. That is another catastrophe. The pot cannot really call the kettle black.
Russia is holding Crimea, parts of Georgia, etc.
There is no world government. Basically, what we have is called "gundagiri" (hooliganism). Whoever has a powerful military can do whatever they want. The weaker countries suffer. China is only following the footsteps of the U.S. I am not saying two wrongs make a right. China is wrong. I am saying that this is nothing new. This is the world order the U.S. created by unilaterally using its might, destroying the U.N., refusing and reducing the international courts, etc.
There has been a lot of good work done on world governance and there are lots of good people who can set up one. Your post was taking a potshot at world governance. It is a serious idea. If your knowledge of world governance ends and begins in a song, then there is not much to say. See here for starters.
World Governance There are many forms and many works that have been done.
In some sense, I want China to do whatever the U.S. and Russia have been doing. If one party breaks the law and goes scott-free, then we won't see a change. Perhaps China doing the plundering that the U.S. and Russia were doing will bring everyone to the table to actually have some international laws with some teeth. Otherwise, you will see rogue nations attacking whoever they want whenever they want.
For starters, strengthen the U.N. Remove the apartheid that is veto power in the U.N. Why should only five countries have veto power? Etc.
Happy to have a serious discussion on world governance and take my blinders off. For people whose idea of world governance begins and ends in a Lennon song, there is nothing to discuss.
I have accepted Sin Hombre's views that are different many times. One example is his contention that things could have been better if China declared the virus as present internationally. Though Italy's sewer system tested shows coronavirus from December, 2019 and a French person was found to have coronavirus as early as November 2019, yes, announcing the virus would perhaps have reduced the numbers in Italy. In that I was slightly wrong.
But, when you have nothing but random opinions, then there is no reason to take any blinders off. Happy to change my views based on data, evidence, and solid reasoning. Not taking any blinders off based on random opinions.