brightsideup wrote:T. Chandrasekaran, coaching director at the National Tennis Academy, concurs.“The ranks are based on points from various tournaments in our region and do not necessarily reflect their standard,” he tells Mumbai Mirror.“Real tennis is played in Europe and America and their boys have very strong fundamentals and have good technique. Our boys have a long way to go. They need to work much harder and also fine tune their technique. They can’t be content with results in Asia.”
(
anupam.pratihary@timesgroup.com)
http://www.mumbaimirror.com/mmpaper.asp?sectid=6&articleid=65200523581515652005235729125
Knowing Chandra as I do, I think his words were meant to encourage, not to discourage. But the rest of the article takes his words and twists them out of context to drive home a completely different point than what Chandra intended. As a player and coach, Chandra would never ever put down his own players in preference to those from other countries. If I were Chandra, I would sue the Mirror, but he is not the suing type.
The comments about technique and fitness are mostly correct. This has always been the crux of the issue. Technique on serve, for example. is rarely taught correctly in India, as we have noted previously regarding Sania's serve. Coaching technique is very advanced in the USA and Europe and I myself have learned a great deal from interactions with coaches here.
Another area that is lacking in Indian players is adequate training in patterns around the transition game (transition from defence to offence and vice versa). Coaches here in the USA spend a lot of time with their key players in this area, once they have proven themselves at the Championship level. In fact, some specialists like Allen Fox have worked on the defence-to-offence transition with many players, helping otherwise great groundstrokers become highly-capable volleyers as well.
Hopefully I will get a chance to meet with Chandra in the next few months and discuss some of these issues with him.
Cheers,
Krish Narayan USPTA