Because in order to compare who needs a longer rope for rescue (which is just a hypothetical exercise), you have to consider the situation where everyone is judged under similar conditions.sanjay8886 wrote:Why do we need to discount last 10-12 innings of Dravid? Is it becoz he did not play those innings or may be he did not get paid for those innings? Is he not t
I'm not saying that the selection committee should discount those innings. All I was saying is that prasen's list is faulty because it considers different people under different circumstances.
So it would make sense to compare Dravid's rut to Tendulkar's phase when things like "ENDulkar" etc were being reported, and not to the current Tendulkar.