prasen9 wrote:I think the true test should be the accuracy of the predictions. How many of your predictions come through/How many predictions you made. There are issues with this metric, but, for the sake of simplicity, that should suffice. If someone makes a lot of predictions of medals-won/rankings-achieved left and right and then some of them comes through, that is not as impressive as someone who makes few predictions but a lot of them are correct.
Agreed. and for the record it is 0.8 / 1
!! I am claiming the silver medal to be as charming and as valuable as 80% of Gold!!
Rather than replacing Gopichand, why not try to augment his coaching with better support staff, including some specialists sport psychology, software for better analyses, etc. There is always room for improvement and it need not come by replacing someone!! Obviously a politician jumping on the bandwagon wouldn't know any better....