even if you ignore such a written statement, what about the findings of military Court of Inquiry? Ignore that as well - since it was constituted, when Idiot Singh was the chief?!
Army chief VK Singh
Re: Army chief VK Singh
Obviously, anything filed in writing as an affidavit to the Supreme court of India is meaningless... since it came from some bureaucrats!
even if you ignore such a written statement, what about the findings of military Court of Inquiry? Ignore that as well - since it was constituted, when Idiot Singh was the chief?!
even if you ignore such a written statement, what about the findings of military Court of Inquiry? Ignore that as well - since it was constituted, when Idiot Singh was the chief?!
-
prashanthm
- Member
- Posts: 4969
- Joined: Sat Mar 03, 2012 9:36 am
- Antispam: No
- Please enter the middle number: 5
- Location: MA
Re: Army chief VK Singh
Probably Off Topic, but if people give no importance to Smriti Irani's affidavits on educational qualifications, why should it be different with the affidavits of VK Singh...
Re: Ex-Army chief VK Singh
not sure I understand what your trying imply here prashanthm
1. we are not talking about any "affidavit" from Idiot Singh.
2. this is a written statement from ministry of defense, filed as a response to an ongoing case, in the Supreme court. If the court finds such an "affidavit" to be factually wrong, obviously the person responsible can and should be held accountable....
3. Smriti Irani filed a statement to ECI, signed by her - just take it for what it is worth. I have no comments on the inconsistencies in her statements
1. we are not talking about any "affidavit" from Idiot Singh.
2. this is a written statement from ministry of defense, filed as a response to an ongoing case, in the Supreme court. If the court finds such an "affidavit" to be factually wrong, obviously the person responsible can and should be held accountable....
3. Smriti Irani filed a statement to ECI, signed by her - just take it for what it is worth. I have no comments on the inconsistencies in her statements
-
arjun2761
- Member
- Posts: 7376
- Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2005 2:26 pm
- Please enter the middle number: 1
- Location: US
- Been thanked: 10 times
Re: Ex-Army chief VK Singh
Hey Kujo,kujo wrote:not sure I understand what your trying imply here prashanthm
1. we are not talking about any "affidavit" from Idiot Singh.
2. this is a written statement from ministry of defense, filed as a response to an ongoing case, in the Supreme court. If the court finds such an "affidavit" to be factually wrong, obviously the person responsible can and should be held accountable....
3. Smriti Irani filed a statement to ECI, signed by her - just take it for what it is worth. I have no comments on the inconsistencies in her statements
Haven't read the affidavit, but to the extent it states conclusions (rather than simply states verified factual evidence), these are pretty malleable in almost legal system and India's legal system is about malleable as it gets. Furthermore, it appears that the affidavit is from the defense ministry which is completely and directly under the control of the executive branch (controlled by the UPA) which further reduces its credibility as it is very likely to be politically motivated.
The fact that it is "written" affidavit rather than an oral testimony doesn't really change its malleability.